|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
Education| 25 January 2010
Biases In Investing
“I’m an idiot. I shouldn’t have sold off ‘Stock A’. I just know that it will rocket upwards in the next few days. And now it has surged. It is so obvious. I should have seen it coming.” Do the above sentences sound familiar? If yes, then you have a hindsight bias. Biases are typically insidious and can affect and distort our thinking and interpretation of data and choices without our knowledge, thus we have to be wary of the biases and act accordingly. In this article, I will seek to demystify the insidious biases which may cloud our judgment and affect our investment decisions. 1. Equity home bias Equity home bias refers to the biased perspective which investors have in holding foreign equity which result in them holding modest amounts of foreign equity, despite the benefits from international diversification. In other words, retail investors in Singapore are more likely to hold Singapore listed shares then U.S. shares as they believe that they know the companies better. For me, I have this equity home bias. Rather, I believe that I should just analyse companies within my circle of competence and not analyse other overseas companies where I don’t have a competitive edge over other investors and traders. In addition, different countries present their financial statements differently so I prefer to use the time and effort on Singapore listed counters. Currently, I believe there are still companies worthy of analysis on our Singapore bourse. 2. Confirmation bias Confirmation bias is a tendency to focus on information that confirms one’s preconceptions, independently of whether they are correct. If I give the same analyst report on Stock A with a neutral call to two people, each with an opposite opinion, the investor who is bullish on Stock A is likely to more readily remember positive information in the analyst report which corroborates his bullish position. So does the investor who is bearish on stock A. He will likely remember information which supports his bearish position. Besides selective collection of evidence, confirmation bias may set in during the interpretation of evidence. For example, if I believe the economy is likely to be strong for the next two years, I may interpret inventory surplus as a sign of robust outlook as producers stock up inventory for future demand. A person who believes that the economy is likely to remain weak will view the inventory surplus as lack of current demand which may spiral into price cuts and affect the company’s margins. Thus, to interpret the situation on inventory surplus, one has to take into consideration of a broad range of data to reach a conclusion, bearing in mind the presence of confirmation bias. 3. Hindsight bias This refers to the predilection to exaggerate one’s ability to have foreseen the end result, after the outcome has happened. Simply put, this is the “I knew it all along” phenomenon. Oftentimes, investors would chide themselves that they should have held on to an investment longer, so that they can reap more gains. Or, they should have cut their losses upon seeing some red flags in the companies’ financial statements. Some of these “should have” may be genuine mistakes (which investors should learn), while others may not be that obvious at that point in time. Thus, it is important to be aware of this bias and do not criticize yourself too harshly for events which are uncontrollable. 4. Status quo bias Status quo bias is the inertia to change and the comfort of the present situation, regardless of whether this situation is optimal. An example of this is that there are still many investors who prefer to keep their excess funds in savings accounts or money funds. They are unwilling to allocate part of their excess funds to investments such as stocks and bonds as this would deviate from the status quo. Besides the inertia to change which can manifest in the type of assets that you own, status quo bias can also appear in another situation. For example, security analysts may take a long time to amend their previous estimates and assumptions (as they don’t want to change) when new information should make them reanalyze the situation and prospects. Investors should constantly evaluate their existing investments as and when there are important information announced by the company so that they would not succumb to the status quo bias. 5. Availability bias This refers to the events which are readily “available” in your memory which we will naturally presume that such events are commonplace. For example, vivid footages of airplane crashes are typically available in our memory and we may wrongfully think that airplane crashes are rather common. However, studies have shown that the chances of having an airplane accident are one in 11 million vis-à-vis one in 5000 for car crashes. Similarly, some investors may have heard high profile accounting scandals of S-chip companies such as Oriental Century, China Aviation Oil, China Sun Biochem etc. and they have sworn off investing in S-chips as a whole. In my opinion, there is bound to be some black sheep now and then. It is not wise to ignore the S-chip universe as a whole as there are bound to be some good companies with upright management and sound business fundamentals, trading at attractive valuations. 6. Self serving bias Self serving bias means that humans usually attribute their successes to internal or personal factors but attribute their failures to situational factors beyond their control. For example, if I invest in Stock A and it collapses the next day, I may attribute that to market manipulation or general market weakness which I cannot control. However, if it rallies 50% the next day, I would view myself as 股神 or (God of Stocks). The above bias is quite destructive to investing as it shrinks responsibility when something goes wrong. For most of the investments which went wrong, I do believe that there may be some red flags which we have overlooked and we should take responsibility and learn from them. Conclusion In the investment arena, we have many variables to contend with. Some of them are controllable like our emotions, our biases, the amount of hard work that we put in etc. Some of them are uncontrollable, like how the market will move in the next 30 minutes, or whether President Obama would announce sweeping and potentially damaging changes to the banking sector. In order to increase the probability of investing in a profitable investment, we should control those controllable variables. Knowing the biases and how they manifest in investment decisions, and most important of all, make a conscious effort to prevent most of these biases would substantially increase the odds in profiting from investments over time. To draw a quote from Sun Tzu, Art of War, “to secure ourselves (our biases) against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself (the market).” Ernest Lim worked as an assistant treasury and investment manager. Prior to this role, he was with Legacy Capital Group Pte Ltd, a boutique asset management and private equity firm, as an investment manager since 2006. He received a Bachelor of Accountancy (Honours) from Nanyang Technological University in 2005. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst, as well as, a Certified Public Accountant Singapore. He has since commenced work as a remisier and has stopped working as a freelance writer.
Related Articles
Write a Comment
|
ADVERTISEMENT
Join the tens of thousands of investors reading Shares Investment! [+]
Since July 1995, Shares Investment has been well-acclaimed by both the investing public and local stock-broking houses such as UOB-Kay Hian, Phillip Securities, Kim Eng Securities and DBS Vickers Securities - boasting of more than 30,000 readers every issue.
ADVERTISEMENT
Topics
Copyright 2008-2010 Pioneers & Leaders eMedia Pte Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
Best viewed with Mozilla Firefox 3.5 and above.
|
Twitter
Facebook
